Worldwide, the COVID-19 pandemic had generated comprehensive
lockdowns that offer an unparalleled opportunity to consider how large-scale
changes in human activities will affect companies. By declaring national
emergencies and creating more or less extensive lockdowns to facilitate social
distancing, most governments around the world have responded to the spread of
the disease. Medium, small businesses are the key casualties of the COVID-19
outbreak. Many researchers' results show that most of the participating
companies have suffered seriously and face many obstacles, including financial
instability, disruption to the supply chain, reduced demand, profits and loss
of earnings, and others. Mostly the small industries or small livestock
businesses like the one of Bi-Chow suffer from immense loss almost to the point
of being shut down the business. In addition, more than 83% of companies were
not planned for this scenario, nor had any proposals. Breeders like Bi's livelihoods are among those most
specifically affected by a coronavirus, while employees in all sectors will ask
similar questions as difficulties cascade.
Keeping in mind the scenario of locked down to prevent the spread of the virus was useful to a certain extent but the cause via which this emerged was when China opened the borders in September 2019 knowing that the scientists and researchers had been infected with a virus and they still let them travel the world. That very decision by the Chinese Government was the major fault in the spread of the virus. The lockdowns were then only a strong effort to decrease the spread within the region. Several governments have used these techniques to effectively reduce the spread of the Covid-19 and others which resulted in miserable labor.
In my opinion, COVID 19 has
affected the business industry badly but we can’t blame the locked down as it
was the only way to reduce the spread of the virus yet I think it could be
controlled by smart locked down as closing the educational institutions, beauty
salons, small businesses but should have let the bug industries on which the
economy works operate in strict SOPS.
A sustained well designed
health policy measure could have been much more helpful for the economy of a
certain country than a complete locked down. The negative impacts of locked down can be seen in different
industries. Farm workers are heavily dependent on the
current structure for temporary harvesting. Failure of some employees to enter
agriculture can lead to food losses through lock-downs and damage to the
world's supply chain may lead to food import malnutrition in many developed
economies. On the other
hand, a drop in manufacturing production may help to minimize industrial
waste management practices. However, the rise in home cooking and demand for
home deliveries would increase household waste.
As regards material reserves, it is worth noting that the pandemic
does not kill the financial assets but delay human movements and products
production within the economy, unlike tornado events, flutes, volcanic
eruptions and other natural disasters. In other words, when social dissociation
measures are in effect, the capital asset capability usage stays low, but
should return to usual levels after the conclusion of the health crisis.
Finally, the
beneficial and damaging effects of the pandemic on resource and waste flows and
supplies remain somewhat unclear since the environmental impact of the pandemic
is believed to be transferred between industries and areas. Pandemics provide a
remarkable chance to gain deeper insight into these emerging institutions'
capabilities and vulnerabilities and how under typical situations they
contribute to the survival of our communities.
No comments:
Post a Comment